Where all I see
are mindless animals,
and humans are scarce,
like trees in a desert.
This place,
which trust has renounced,
and love has long since forsaken;
where the vain control resources,
and the merciless play at justice;
where friendship lacks all charm,
and blood relations are just as dull;
where children are
their fathers’ enemies;
where the savior kills,
the bully leads,
the godman trades,
selling his edicts
to the highest bidder;
where the houses of God
are unsafe for His creation;
where cold-blooded murderers
call dibs on heaven,
for killing His people;
This can’t be a human dwelling,
This place I call home.
Has a plague visited this land,
this kaleidoscope of color,
this bright rainbow of diversity?
Yes, there has been a plague,
a vicious swarm of locusts,
eating away all our shining shades,
our dappled hues,
save one,
which is now the color of everything.
And so,
black is white,
so is blue,
and red too.
The animals are white,
in their ignorant bliss,
and so am I,
can’t refute this.
And so must be anyone
who dreams of life,
like I once did,
as a mesh of color.
His spirit is to be broken,
his thinking set right,
he must be brought to heel,
and bathed in that insipid,
colorless,
puritanical
white!
While I,
I keep asking myself,
is this the realization of my dreams,
this dwelling of humans,
this place I call home
where I can’t even recognize myself
anymore,
and my life grates on, day by day?
Loosely translated from the Seraiki of Zafar Jatoi's timeless verse "pata nai ay kay jhaeen wasti hay?", on the recommendations of a friend. The only video link of Jatoi sahib reciting this poem that I could find is below:
Inspiration came upon me while on the throne this morning. Endless, moralistic talk will get us nowhere. True change, a true challenge to the established orders of oppression, demands action, and sacrifice!
باطل کی سیاہ رات میں حق کی تنویر بھی ہو
انالحق کا بیاں، مقابل شمشیر بھی ہو
نوائے خلق خود کاتب تقدیر بھی ہو
یزیدیت کا قلعہ، ہم سے تسخیر بھی ہو
ممکن ہے تبھی جب کوئی حق پرست، دل فگار
متاع جان لٹائے، کوئی شبیر بھی ہو
Who doesn’t love dogs? I know I do. And why do humans love
dogs so much? Because dogs, in a weirdly anthropomorphic way, suffer from a
feeble sense of the self.Nothing is
more gratifying to the human ego than having something or someone worship you
unquestioningly, love you unconditionally and grovel constantly at your feet.
And a dog’s entire existence revolves around catering to this most vulgar
aspect of human nature. A dog’s love is seldom for its own kind. It reserves
its love almost entirely for the humans in its life. Unless, it is kept by a
particularly jealous sort of a human who teaches it to love just one and be
mean to all others. Feed it, don’t feed it, beat it, lock it up, you will
always find a dog begging for your affections first, and its own sustenance
second. Sure, if you starve it too much, you might find it eating out of the
trash one day. And while you may tut-tut at the damn thing for not having
better manners, or punish it even, the dog only did what it is genetically
wired to do: feed. Even in doing so, your place at the center of its universe
is by no means compromised because a dog does not understand blame, or
cause-and-effect.
But a dog, like all things living, has its limitations. For
instance, you can’t hogtie one and throw it down a well, or abandon an
inconvenient one by the wayside as you speed away chasing mirages, and then
expect the mutt to come back to you by itself, as and when you want. It is not
that that dog does not want to return to you; it would probably sign away its
soul to perdition for a chance at coming back to you. The only problem, the
manner of its repudiation at your hand dictates that the dog absolutely has no means
of making the return journey. It is literally impossible as per the laws of the
universe. And so, you become solely responsible, not just for the slow,
miserable, often lifelong death you have condemned the animal to, but also for
your own pangs of conscience and your yearnings for uncomplicated love especially
when the transient possibilities you were pursuing have come to nothing.
And this applies to all dogs, mongrels or pedigreed,
high-born or strays, royal or proletarian. When you steal yourself away from
the center of a dog’s universe, all you leave behind is the pretense of life,
wretched, loveless, brutish. And in that, at least, I am a kindred spirit to
the unwanted dogs of the earth.
Act II – Duty
I am not looking for a mid-life crisis,
or expensive roller coaster rides
that will only end badly for me.
I want no part
of your cold-blooded cirque des émotions,
where you are in perpetual need
of a short-lived reprieve.
Nor do I fancy myself
the safety valve
to your pressure-cooker life.
I know full well who the first casualty will be
when that thing begins to scream.
I am fully absorbed,
curating the cemetery of my mind,
where I stumble about,
gravestone to gravestone,
mourning bits of me
that lie rotting underneath.
Act III – Requiem
While on the subject of decay, you know what continues to
fester? This feeling that while you were a monster, a bastard, for having been
angry when anger was all that was left to you, for all the hurt that your rage
caused them, they were absolutely justified in turning a deaf ear to your helpless
howls of pain, in totally disregarding the ferment inside of you that was wrecking
your emotional constitution, because greener pastures beckoned to them with
promising options and more attractive possibilities. For one, there are no
other options in love; and if there are, it was never love to begin with but a
self-indulgent market decision. And second, ever since the dawn of time, the
jury has been out on what could be more offensive to a person: the faraway, spasmodic
yelps of a wounded animal, or the whimsically cold, dismissive manner in which
they wounded it, with the cheerful gravy of ‘I always was heartless this way’
on top. You can’t murder somebody and then go, ‘hey, I did you the favor of
killing you silently, softly; did you have to make so much noise during your
protracted demise?’ History is replete with examples of how people bring
themselves to detest those they have wronged, dehumanizing themselves along the
way; of how even the tortured breathing of the oppressed feels like lèse-majesté
to the oppressor.
So, whatever you have confessed yourself to be over time,
cold, selfish, narcissistic, always on the lookout for a better deal, a
‘chutiya’, in so many words, please know that it is you who has to live with
yourself primarily, not even the option that is your current ego trip. It is
you who has to look yourself in the mirror every day. And for someone with a different
face for each and everything in their life, expediently changing with needs, desires
and ambitions, one wonders whether you even recognize yourself when you do.
As for the wounded, with time, wounds become scars, and
scars become friends that tell the most exciting stories. Anger, when gets too
toxic for the soul, abates, leaving behind enlightenment and peace. But the
facts, the facts remain as beacons to guide you for next when the fundamentally
dishonest chutiya surfaces to make you doubt the foundations of your existence.
Act IV – Salud
*clink*
Act V – Curtains
Why do you stand there,
over my corpse,
looking outraged,
half a teardrop
in your eye?
Didn’t you know
when you stab someone
in the heart
they fucking die!?
shaa'er ka jashn e salgirah hai, sharaab la
mansab, khitaab, rutba, unhein kya nahi mila
bas naqs hai toh itna k mamdooh ne koi
misraa kisi kitaab k shayaa'n nahi likha
And now, a draft of my thank you note to the Daily Times:
"Dear DT! If your subs are going to go fuckin' nuts on editing a submission, at least pass their masterwork by the original author before publishing it for the whole fucking world to see. You've defaced this piece beyond recognition. Everybody who's reading this is thinking this Multani boy doesn't even know jack about basic tenses, much less stringing together a decent sentence. It's moolah ffs, not mullah!! Moolah means money. How does mullah even make sense where your bachas have inserted it? Piece-of-shit editing! And screw you for ruining my most heartfelt rant yet. Love."
Salute to my forebears who acquitted themselves with honor, nobility and an uncompromising respect for humanity in a time when the entire world seemed to be going to hell. Dada, Nana Jan, Nano, Addi Amma, thank you for teaching me what it means to be a decent human being, above everything else.
Amid the
swirling horrors of an unabated spate of child abductions, child pornography
rings, incessant child sexual abuse, rape and murder, and numerous other
excesses against society’s most defenseless members a mere fraction of which
get reported, one would imagine that the country would be preparing to go to
war in the protection of its future, i.e. our children.[1]
Parliament (and provincial assemblies) would be scrambling to debate the merits
of current legislation, pushing through more effective laws and holding the
state apparatus to account on implementation. The media, with their monopoly on
national opinion-making, would bring their massive influence to bear on making
the plight of the child the no. 1 burning issue in the public’s collective attention.
Society at large would engage in mass soul-searching to identify and root out
the causes, circumstances and societal contradictions that pave the way for our
children being brutalized, physically and psychologically.
What we have
instead is a spokesperson for the party-in-power appearing on prime-time TV to
correct facts: only 132, and not 700 or more, children are missing without a
trace from Lahore since the beginning of 2016. And that somehow makes
everything better. Senior police officials conclude that most missing children
are runaways from home and not really kidnapped. But surely, there are at least
a few that have been abducted in broad daylight without as much as a ransom
call or note. There are rumors of an organ-harvesting network in operation. If
that is true, it is surely being abetted by qualified medical workers and
customs and police officials. What is the breadth and intensity of the
investigation if the default setting is: he ran away from home? If the glorious
guardians of our national consciousness, the Parliament and other law-making
bodies, cannot convene to consider, e.g. how a Criminal Procedure Code given by
our colonial masters in 1898 is still valid today; why laws made for Child
Protection in recent years have remained largely toothless especially in the
context of federal legislation and provincial execution; why children-specific
bills are needed based on scientific studies investigating whether things like
rape, emotional and physical trauma and being exploited have different
long-term physical and psychological impact on adults and children; and, how do
you even define a child in this class-, sect- and caste-crazed society, let
them at least sit together and decide upon an arbitrary national threshold of
tolerability for abducted/raped children. 132 is good enough. Heaven forbid if
it were ever to be 133.[2][3][4]
The apathy
of our power elites (media included) towards anything other than the high-drama
of political power-play is nothing out of the ordinary. While the elite
unabashedly exhibits callous disregard, the people seem to suffer from mass
denial bordering on self-delusion. A standard refrain is, especially in the
context of child sexual abuse, that when the phenomenon is rampant in
‘developed’ Western nations, how can Pakistan be expected to eradicate it. This
line especially hurts when coming from good-hearted, well-meaning people. My
only question to such people is, isn’t the decadent West only just materially advantaged
while we, as a nation, have always prided ourselves on being more spiritually
and morally upright? Isn’t the basic premise for our entire national existence
the religion of Islam? Nothing is more symptomatic of a diseased soul than
raping, seducing, or otherwise molesting, a child. Shouldn’t our superior
spiritual strengths have ensured the minimal incidence of such vile crimes in
our society vis-à-vis the immoral West that is going to hell anyway despite its
material advantages? Or should we admit that there is also a disease within our
souls that begs to be treated with all the scientific and spiritual remedies
available to us in the 21st century.
For
perspective, my reading of history leads me to believe, that pederasty, i.e. a
sexual preference for young boys, is not as much a legacy of our Hindu
heritage, blamed as it is for most social ills in present-day Pakistan, as it
is of our cherished Arabian-Persian-Turkic tradition. While ancient Hinduism is
rife with the abominable tradition of child marriages, objective accounts from
Mughal, Ottoman, Abbasid and Persian courts and the life-stories of notable
rulers, warriors, poets and even revered saints point to a vast history of
pederasty in this region. Countries like Afghanistan are also still grappling
with the ramifications of this widely and openly practiced phenomenon, locally
known as ‘Bacha Baazi’.[5][6]
Interestingly, boys who have been thus exploited are culturally expected to go
on and inflict the same upon others as they themselves grow into adulthood.
This forms a vicious chain that is unending across generations. From a six-year
old boy hanging dead after being sodomized on the second floor of a mosque to
the largely-forgotten depredations of the Kasur and Swat child pornography
rings to the hastily-hushed and hardly ever investigated rumors surrounding our
religious seminaries to the regular nuggets on the periphery of the daily news,
it is about time we wake up to this hideous reality, this inherited malaise
that afflicts us. This is not to say, of course, that girl-children are any safer
in Pakistan. Data suggests that no child-type is safe from sexual predators in
our country; rich or poor, boy or girl, disabled or orphaned, housed or
homeless.[7]
In 2007,
Iranian President Ahmedinejad made an international mockery of himself by
claiming that there were no homosexuals in his country.[8]
By turning a blind eye to how children in Pakistan are suffering just because
the fire has not come home yet, many of us stand to make similar fools of
ourselves, especially in the realms of conscience. Not everything from Javed
Iqbal, serial rapist and murderer of over a 100 children in Lahore in the 90s,
to the current, uninhibited row of unexplained kidnappings, is an anomalous
stain on the beautiful face of our country that will go away by itself. Only
after mustering the courage to recognize the issue can the urgently needed conversation
on how elitism, socioeconomic stratification, wage disequilibrium, systemic
governance failures, notions of shame and honor, clerical irresponsibility, broken
and displaced families, absence of a social security net, dysfunctional gender
attitudes and educational systems, and the lack of a sense of collective social
responsibility towards children, all feed into leaving our children so
vulnerable to exploitation.[9]
And this conversation needs to occur at all echelons of society. Comparisons
with other countries or arguing over incidence figures represent a defeatist,
self-serving policy that undermines an unambiguous, absolutely uncompromising
attitude that any self-respecting people should have as to the protection of
their children.
We, in the
present-day, are custodians of our future in the form children that we are
bringing up. Children are the weakest members of society, needing an external
voice to articulate their needs and protect their human rights as they lack the
intellectual and physical capacity themselves. No code of human decency,
religious or secular, looks kindly upon a people who stand in brazen disregard
of the plight of the weakest among them. More poignantly, no society that
remains in denial about gross injustice within itself has any right to harbor
any self-gratifying notions of grandeur, material or spiritual.
There is something sweet about firsts that never fails to charm. I remember when I was turning this paper in for publication, I thought I'd be elated when it finally got carried. Strangely, now that the moment has arrived, all I feel is this quiet satisfaction. And the relief that now I can safely forget about it after lunch!!
So, without much ado, my first ever formal publication as carried in the Summer 2016 edition of the Heinz Journal of Public Policy: